A Penrose tiling can be constructed using just two different tiles in the shape of a thick and thin rhombus:

Here, the angles are multiples of ø = π/5. The edges of these tiles are marked with two different kinds of arrows. This is done to enforce a specific matching rule that ensures that the tiling is non-periodic, which is one of the defining features of Penrose tilings. Different tiles can only be placed next to each other if the touching edges have the same type of arrow and point in the same direction.
If these matching conditions were not in place, then it would be possible to construct tilings which are periodic as shown in the following image. There are translational symmetries present in 8 different directions here:

The image at the top shows a part of a Penrose tiling obeying the matching conditions with the arrows displayed. The numbers are just there to index some other property of directionality not discussed here.
If these matching conditions are satisfied for a complete tiling, then the resulting configuration will always be non-periodic. However, following the matching rules alone does not guarantee an infinite tiling of the entire plane. It is therefore possible to construct finite regions that obey the matching rules, but cannot be extended any further without allowing for periodicities or contradicting the matching rules.
There do exist sets of tiles that will always admit non-periodic tilings in which no extra matching conditions need to be imposed. For a list of such tiles that tile the plane, 3-dimensional space, and even the hyperbolic plane, see this list of aperiodic sets of tiles.
Image sources:
Algebraic Theory of Penrose’s Non-periodic Tiligns of the Plane by N.G. de Bruijn
The Empire Problem in Penrose Tilings by Laura Effinger-Dean

A Penrose tiling can be constructed using just two different tiles in the shape of a thick and thin rhombus:

Here, the angles are multiples of ø = π/5. The edges of these tiles are marked with two different kinds of arrows. This is done to enforce a specific matching rule that ensures that the tiling is non-periodic, which is one of the defining features of Penrose tilings. Different tiles can only be placed next to each other if the touching edges have the same type of arrow and point in the same direction.

If these matching conditions were not in place, then it would be possible to construct tilings which are periodic as shown in the following image. There are translational symmetries present in 8 different directions here:

The image at the top shows a part of a Penrose tiling obeying the matching conditions with the arrows displayed. The numbers are just there to index some other property of directionality not discussed here.

If these matching conditions are satisfied for a complete tiling, then the resulting configuration will always be non-periodic. However, following the matching rules alone does not guarantee an infinite tiling of the entire plane. It is therefore possible to construct finite regions that obey the matching rules, but cannot be extended any further without allowing for periodicities or contradicting the matching rules.

There do exist sets of tiles that will always admit non-periodic tilings in which no extra matching conditions need to be imposed. For a list of such tiles that tile the plane, 3-dimensional space, and even the hyperbolic plane, see this list of aperiodic sets of tiles.

Image sources:

 
  1. addictedtosymmetry reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  2. whalesandpeachtrees reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  3. wheredidmyfuturego reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful
  4. withinternet reblogged this from harrietlane
  5. seiiiiiiichi2 reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  6. heioghopp reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful
  7. magicjug reblogged this from myycupoftea
  8. wistariamarzenie reblogged this from wowgreat
  9. harrietlane reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  10. rohithsblog reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful and added:
    A Penrose tiling can be constructed using just two different titles in the shape of a thick and thin rhombus: Here, the...
  11. shybunnies reblogged this from mr-spiderman
  12. mr-spiderman reblogged this from strawfairy
  13. strawfairy reblogged this from totoreau
  14. drghd reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  15. frazerlikesthis reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  16. uni-que reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  17. jlr7245 reblogged this from wowgreat
  18. wheredoyougetyourinspiration reblogged this from wowgreat
  19. voiceofthequietuniverse reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  20. toinettelab reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful
  21. logicalambiguity reblogged this from spetharrific
  22. welcometocollinwood reblogged this from int0thesunlight
  23. youmightfindmeanyway reblogged this from intothecontinuum
  24. spockandsex reblogged this from spetharrific
  25. lunazigzag reblogged this from spetharrific
  26. spetharrific reblogged this from logicianmagician
  27. borderprocessing reblogged this from alteralles
  28. zevahcaa reblogged this from pgoldl
  29. the-varsha-nerada reblogged this from wowgreat
  30. yesthisisdragon reblogged this from themore-thenerdier
  31. saltflower reblogged this from faiseaux
  32. astradelisiuslove reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful